| Title |
Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Kenyon, Kate Jolly, Karla Hemming, Lucy Ingram, Nicola Gale, Sophie-Anna Dann, Jacky Chambers, Christine MacArthur |
| Abstract |
Maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes are worse in families from black and ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds. There is little evidence on whether lay support improves maternal and infant outcomes among women with complex social needs within a disadvantaged multi-ethnic population in the United Kingdom (UK). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 331 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 15% |
| Psychology | 48 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 102 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,675
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,298
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,173
of 155,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.