↓ Skip to main content

Perceptual selection and the unconscious selection of ‘volunteer’ seedlings in clonally propagated crops: an example with African cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) using ethnobotany and population…

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 718)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Perceptual selection and the unconscious selection of ‘volunteer’ seedlings in clonally propagated crops: an example with African cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) using ethnobotany and population genetics
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10722-016-0390-3
Authors

Marc Delêtre, Trevor R. Hodkinson, Doyle McKey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,552,007
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#50
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,986
of 300,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.