↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Parenting Style on Social Smiling in Infants at High and Low Risk for ASD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Parenting Style on Social Smiling in Infants at High and Low Risk for ASD
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2772-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen M. Harker, Lisa V. Ibañez, Thanh P. Nguyen, Daniel S. Messinger, Wendy L. Stone

Abstract

This study examined how parenting style at 9 months predicts growth in infant social engagement (i.e., social smiling) between 9 and 18 months during a free-play interaction in infants at high (HR-infants) and low (LR-infants) familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Results indicated that across all infants, higher levels of maternal responsiveness were concurrently associated with higher levels of social smiling, while higher levels of maternal directiveness predicted slower growth in social smiling. When accounting for maternal directiveness, which was higher in mothers of HR-infants, HR-infants exhibited greater growth in social smiling than LR-infants. Overall, each parenting style appears to make a unique contribution to the development of social engagement in infants at high- and low-risk for ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 41%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,576,759
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,725
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,141
of 303,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#42
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.