| Title |
Obliterating Thingness: An Introduction to the “What” and the “So What” of Quantum Physics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Foundations of Science, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10699-019-09608-5 |
| Authors |
Kathryn Schaffer, Gabriela Barreto Lemos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 14% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,366,966
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#30
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,711
of 357,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.