↓ Skip to main content

Sleep, Sleep Disorders, and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. What We Know and What We Need to Know: Findings from a National Working Group

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Sleep, Sleep Disorders, and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. What We Know and What We Need to Know: Findings from a National Working Group
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13311-016-0429-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emerson M Wickwire, Scott G Williams, Thomas Roth, Vincent F Capaldi, Michael Jaffe, Margaret Moline, Gholam K Motamedi, Gregory W Morgan, Vincent Mysliwiec, Anne Germain, Renee M Pazdan, Reuven Ferziger, Thomas J Balkin, Margaret E MacDonald, Thomas A Macek, Michael R Yochelson, Steven M Scharf, Christopher J Lettieri

Abstract

Disturbed sleep is one of the most common complaints following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and worsens morbidity and long-term sequelae. Further, sleep and TBI share neurophysiologic underpinnings with direct relevance to recovery from TBI. As such, disturbed sleep and clinical sleep disorders represent modifiable treatment targets to improve outcomes in TBI. This paper presents key findings from a national working group on sleep and TBI, with a specific focus on the testing and development of sleep-related therapeutic interventions for mild TBI (mTBI). First, mTBI and sleep physiology are briefly reviewed. Next, essential empirical and clinical questions and knowledge gaps are addressed. Finally, actionable recommendations are offered to guide active and efficient collaboration between academic, industry, and governmental stakeholders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 55 25%
Unknown 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 21%
Psychology 37 17%
Neuroscience 31 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 62 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#963,261
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#69
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,946
of 314,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.