| Title |
Amphibian Pathogens in Southeast Asian Frog Trade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-013-0817-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Gilbert, David Bickford, Leanne Clark, Arlyne Johnson, Priscilla H. Joyner, Lucy Ogg Keatts, Kongsy Khammavong, Long Nguyễn Văn, Alisa Newton, Tiffany P. W. Seow, Scott Roberton, Soubanh Silithammavong, Sinpakhone Singhalath, Angela Yang, Tracie A. Seimon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,925,201
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#119
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,938
of 288,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.