You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bad News Travels Fastest: A Computational Approach to Predictors of Immediacy in Digital Journalism Ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Digital Journalism, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/21670811.2019.1631706 |
| Authors |
Florian Buhl, Elisabeth Günther, Thorsten Quandt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 33% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 52% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,220,313
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Digital Journalism
#131
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,131
of 362,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digital Journalism
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.