| Title |
Saccades operate in violation of Hick’s law
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Brain Research, August 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00221-002-1168-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kestutis Kveraga, Leanne Boucher, Howard C. Hughes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,477,524
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#904
of 3,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,036
of 44,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.