You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1545968308328727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mindy F. Levin, Jeffrey A. Kleim, Steven L. Wolf |
| Abstract |
There is a lack of consistency among researchers and clinicians in the use of terminology that describes changes in motor ability following neurological injury. Specifically, the terms and definitions of motor compensation and motor recovery have been used in different ways, which is a potential barrier to interdisciplinary communication. This Point of View describes the problem and offers a solution in the form of definitions of compensation and recovery at the neuronal, motor performance, and functional levels within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning model. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Turkey | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,000 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 966 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 170 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 162 | 16% |
| Researcher | 98 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 79 | 8% |
| Other | 200 | 20% |
| Unknown | 208 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 19% |
| Engineering | 143 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 136 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 127 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 4% |
| Other | 119 | 12% |
| Unknown | 246 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,911,493
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#478
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,487
of 164,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.