Title |
Personal and Occupational Exposure to Organic Solvents and Risk of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) in Women (United States)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, December 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10552-005-0385-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ikuko Kato, Karen L. Koenig, Hiroko Watanabe-Meserve, Mark S. Baptiste, Patricia P. Lillquist, Glauco Frizzera, Jerome S. Burke, Miriam Moseson, Roy E. Shore |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Psychology | 2 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,806,772
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#426
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,169
of 160,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.