You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hamed Ekhtiari, Hosna Tavakoli, Giovanni Addolorato, Chris Baeken, Antonello Bonci, Salvatore Campanella, Luis Castelo-Branco, Gaëlle Challet-Bouju, Vincent P Clark, Eric Claus, Pinhas N Dannon, Alessandra Del Felice, Tess den Uyl, Marco Diana, Massimo di Giannantonio, John R Fedota, Paul Fitzgerald, Luigi Gallimberti, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Sarah C Herremans, Martin J Herrmann, Asif Jamil, Eman Khedr, Christos Kouimtsidis, Karolina Kozak, Evgeny Krupitsky, Claus Lamm, William V Lechner, Graziella Madeo, Nastaran Malmir, Giovanni Martinotti, William M McDonald, Chiara Montemitro, Ester M Nakamura-Palacios, Mohammad Nasehi, Xavier Noël, Masoud Nosratabadi, Martin Paulus, Mauro Pettorruso, Basant Pradhan, Samir K Praharaj, Haley Rafferty, Gregory Sahlem, Betty Jo Salmeron, Anne Sauvaget, Renée S Schluter, Carmen Sergiou, Alireza Shahbabaie, Christine Sheffer, Primavera A Spagnolo, Vaughn R Steele, Ti-Fei Yuan, Josanne D M van Dongen, Vincent Van Waes, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, Antonio Verdejo-García, Ilse Verveer, Justine W Welsh, Michael J Wesley, Katie Witkiewitz, Fatemeh Yavari, Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast, Laurie Zawertailo, Xiaochu Zhang, Yoon-Hee Cha, Tony P George, Flavio Frohlich, Anna E Goudriaan, Shirley Fecteau, Stacey B Daughters, Elliot A Stein, Felipe Fregni, Michael A Nitsche, Abraham Zangen, Marom Bikson, Colleen A Hanlon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 26% |
| Canada | 8 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 28 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 402 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 81 | 20% |
| Unknown | 135 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 74 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 12% |
| Psychology | 49 | 12% |
| Engineering | 15 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Unknown | 164 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#998,901
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#399
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,327
of 364,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#5
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.