| Title |
Viewpoint: Extinction Rebellion: radical or rational?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x704357 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepa Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 39% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,618,722
of 23,983,331 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,518
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,435
of 353,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#66
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.