| Title |
WASH practices and its association with nutritional status of adolescent girls in poverty pockets of eastern India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12905-019-0787-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aparajita Chattopadhyay, Vani Sethi, Varsha P. Nagargoje, Abhishek Saraswat, Nikita Surani, Neeraj Agarwal, Vikas Bhatia, Manisha Ruikar, Sourav Bhattacharjee, Rabi N. Parhi, Shivani Dar, Abner Daniel, H. P. S. Sachdev, C. M. Singh, Rajkumar Gope, Vikash Nath, Neha Sareen, Arjan De Wagt, Sayeed Unisa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 7 | 37% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Nepal | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 298 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 5% |
| Researcher | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 150 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 154 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,585,865
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#304
of 2,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,200
of 364,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.