| Title |
Early magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injury: a cost analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-012-1926-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nirav K. Patel, Andrew Bucknill, David Ahearne, Janet Denning, Kailash Desai, Martin Watson |
| Abstract |
Acute knee injury is common, and MRI is often only used when non-operative management fails because of limited availability. We investigated whether early MRI in acute knee injury is more clinically and cost-effective compared to conventional physiotherapy and reassessment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,089
of 2,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,860
of 155,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.