↓ Skip to main content

Perceived functional ability assessed with the spinal function sort: is it valid for European rehabilitation settings in patients with non-specific non-acute low back pain?

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Perceived functional ability assessed with the spinal function sort: is it valid for European rehabilitation settings in patients with non-specific non-acute low back pain?
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00586-010-1429-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. R. Oesch, R. Hilfiker, J. P. Kool, S. Bachmann, K. B. Hagen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 22%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,317,110
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#3,647
of 4,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,983
of 94,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.