| Title |
The role of clonal communication and heterogeneity in breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-019-5883-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Martín-Pardillos, Ángeles Valls Chiva, Gemma Bande Vargas, Pablo Hurtado Blanco, Roberto Piñeiro Cid, Pedro J. Guijarro, Stefan Hümmer, Eva Bejar Serrano, Aitor Rodriguez-Casanova, Ángel Diaz-Lagares, Josep Castellvi, Samuel Miravet-Verde, Luis Serrano, María Lluch-Senar, Víctor Sebastian, Ana Bribian, Laura López-Mascaraque, Rafael López-López, Santiago Ramón y Cajal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 60% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,623,409
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,379
of 8,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,077
of 347,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#42
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.