↓ Skip to main content

GPS-derived geocenter motion from the IGS second reprocessing campaign

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
GPS-derived geocenter motion from the IGS second reprocessing campaign
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40623-019-1054-2
Authors

Liansheng Deng, Zhao Li, Na Wei, Yifang Ma, Hua Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,260
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,188
of 362,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.