↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the scaling of the tree branch diameters frequency distribution with terrestrial laser scanning: methodological framework and issues

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the scaling of the tree branch diameters frequency distribution with terrestrial laser scanning: methodological framework and issues
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0854-7
Authors

Mathieu Dassot, Meriem Fournier, Christine Deleuze

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Environmental Science 6 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,601,876
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#473
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,077
of 367,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.