↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for the gastric involvement of follicular lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for the gastric involvement of follicular lymphoma
Published in
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12328-019-01015-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yudai Koya, Tatsuyuki Watanabe, Keiichiro Kume, Shinsuke Kumei, Ichiro Yoshikawa, Takashi Tasaki, Masaru Harada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,574,742
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
#221
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,731
of 347,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.