| Title |
Mammographic screening in male patients at high risk for breast cancer: is it worth it?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-019-05338-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Adele Marino, Ayca Gucalp, Doris Leithner, Delia Keating, Daly Avendano, Blanca Bernard-Davila, Elizabeth A. Morris, Katja Pinker, Maxine S. Jochelson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 46% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,870,253
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#234
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,736
of 365,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.