You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanistic investigation of mEos4b reveals a strategy to reduce track interruptions in sptPALM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-019-0462-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elke De Zitter, Daniel Thédié, Viola Mönkemöller, Siewert Hugelier, Joël Beaudouin, Virgile Adam, Martin Byrdin, Luc Van Meervelt, Peter Dedecker, Dominique Bourgeois |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 20 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 16 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,767,384
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,028
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,769
of 363,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#49
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.