↓ Skip to main content

Can the Patterns of Sexual Swelling Cycles in Female Taï Chimpanzees be Explained by the Cost-of-Sexual-Attraction Hypothesis?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Can the Patterns of Sexual Swelling Cycles in Female Taï Chimpanzees be Explained by the Cost-of-Sexual-Attraction Hypothesis?
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10764-007-9120-1
Authors

Tobias Deschner, Christophe Boesch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 55%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,477,524
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,427
of 72,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.