| Title |
Cardiovascular Biomarkers After Metabolic Surgery Versus Medical Therapy for Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepak L. Bhatt, Ali Aminian, Sangeeta R. Kashyap, John P. Kirwan, Kathy Wolski, Stacy A. Brethauer, Stanley L. Hazen, Steven E. Nissen, Philip R. Schauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 33% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Egypt | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 12 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,167,539
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,823
of 16,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,806
of 364,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#78
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.