Title |
Prevalence of Infective Endocarditis in Enterococcus faecalis Bacteremia
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.059 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anders Dahl, Kasper Iversen, Niels Tonder, Nis Hoest, Magnus Arpi, Morten Dalsgaard, Mahtab Chehri, Lars L. Soerensen, Soren Fanoe, Soeren Junge, Ulla Hoest, Nana Valeur, Trine K. Lauridsen, Emil Fosbol, Thomas Hoi-Hansen, Niels E. Bruun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 26 | 46% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
Germany | 3 | 5% |
Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
Ethiopia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 51% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 30% |
Scientists | 10 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 15 | 14% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#652,020
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,667
of 17,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,750
of 366,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#49
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.