↓ Skip to main content

Review of Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Made by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Powder Feedstock

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
466 Mendeley
Title
Review of Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Made by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Powder Feedstock
Published in
JOM, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11837-015-1759-z
Authors

Allison M. Beese, Beth E. Carroll

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 466 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 462 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 21%
Student > Master 72 15%
Researcher 54 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 65 14%
Unknown 115 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 173 37%
Materials Science 101 22%
Unspecified 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 <1%
Energy 3 <1%
Other 18 4%
Unknown 160 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,564
of 396,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#12
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.