↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Non‐governmental Organizations: Global Surgery’s Unknown Nonprofit Sector

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Surgical Non‐governmental Organizations: Global Surgery’s Unknown Nonprofit Sector
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3486-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua S. Ng‐Kamstra, Johanna N. Riesel, Sumedha Arya, Brad Weston, Tino Kreutzer, John G. Meara, Mark G. Shrime

Abstract

Charitable organizations may play a significant role in the delivery of surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, in order to quantify their collective contribution, to account for the care they provide in national surgical plans, and to maximize coordination between organizations, a comprehensive database of these groups is required. We aimed to create such a database using web-available data. We searched for organizations that meet the United Nations Rule of Law definition of non-governmental organizations and provide surgery in LMICs. We termed these surgical non-governmental organizations (s-NGOs). We screened multiple sources including a listing of disaster relief organizations, medical volunteerism databases, charity commissions, and the results of a literature search. We performed a secondary review of each eligible organization's website to verify inclusion criteria and extracted data. We found 403 s-NGOs providing surgery in all 139 LMICs, with most (61 %) incorporating surgery into a broader spectrum of health services. Over 80 % of s-NGOs had an office in the USA, the UK, Canada, India, or Australia, and they most commonly provided surgery in India (87 s-NGOs), Haiti (71), Kenya (60), and Ethiopia (55). The most common specialties provided were general surgery (184), obstetrics and gynecology (140), and plastic surgery (116). This new catalog includes the largest number of s-NGOs to date, but this is likely to be incomplete. This list will be made publicly available to promote collaboration between s-NGOs, national health systems, and global health policymakers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 24%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#5,093,862
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#824
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,935
of 305,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#8
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.