↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Pravastatin in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
51 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Pravastatin in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease
Published in
Circulation, March 2016
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy E Hague, John Simes, Adrienne Kirby, Anthony C Keech, Harvey D White, David Hunt, Paul J Nestel, David M Colquhoun, Helen Pater, Ralph A Stewart, David R Sullivan, Peter L Thompson, Malcolm West, Paul P Glasziou, Andrew M Tonkin

Abstract

-We aimed to assess the long-term effects of treatment with statin therapy on all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, and cancer incidence from extended follow-up of the Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) trial. -LIPID initially compared pravastatin and placebo over 6 years in 9014 patients with prior coronary heart disease (CHD). After the double-blind period, all patients were offered open-label statin therapy. Data were obtained over a further 10 years from 7721 patients, by direct contact for 2 years, questionnaires thereafter, and from mortality and cancer registries. During extended follow-up, 85% assigned pravastatin and 84% assigned placebo took statin therapy. Patients assigned pravastatin maintained a significantly lower risk of death from CHD (relative risk (RR) 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.97;P=0.009), from cardiovascular disease (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81-0.95;P=0.002), and from any cause (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.97; absolute risk reduction 2.6%;P=0.003).Cancer incidence was similar by original treatment group during the double-blind period (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08;P=0.41), later follow-up (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.14;P= 0.74), and overall (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08;P=0.83). Nor were there significant differences in cancer mortality, or in the incidence of organspecific cancers. Cancer findings were confirmed in a meta-analysis with other large statin trials with extended follow-up. -In LIPID, the absolute survival benefit from 6 years pravastatin treatment appeared to be maintained for the next 10 years, with a similar risk of death among survivors in both groups after the initial period. Treatment with statins does not influence cancer or death from noncardiovascular causes during long-term follow-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 26%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Mathematics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,285,148
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#3,035
of 21,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,552
of 315,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#57
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.