| Title |
Multimodal data revealed different neurobiological correlates of intelligence between males and females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11682-019-00146-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rongtao Jiang, Vince D. Calhoun, Yue Cui, Shile Qi, Chuanjun Zhuo, Jin Li, Rex Jung, Jian Yang, Yuhui Du, Tianzi Jiang, Jing Sui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Chile | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 88% |
| Scientists | 6 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 21% |
| Psychology | 15 | 20% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#682,780
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#30
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,404
of 363,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.