↓ Skip to main content

Training Courses in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery on Cadaver Thiel: Results of a Satisfaction Survey on Students and Professors

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Training Courses in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery on Cadaver Thiel: Results of a Satisfaction Survey on Students and Professors
Published in
Obesity Surgery, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11695-019-04003-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, Isabel Prieto-Nieto, Damián García-Olmo, Francisco Clascá, Pablo Enriquez, Ramon Villalonga, Lorea Zubiaga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,574,742
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#3,050
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,457
of 352,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#58
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.