| Title |
Synthesis and characterization of water-soluble carbon nanotubes from mustard soot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pramana, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03010456 |
| Authors |
Prashant Dubey, Devarajan Muthukumaran, Subhashis Dash, Rupa Mukhopadhyay, Sabyasachi Sarkar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 36% |
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 20 | 24% |
| Materials Science | 18 | 21% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,049,987
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Pramana
#18
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,283
of 60,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pramana
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them