↓ Skip to main content

Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Law & Security Review, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
77 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations
Published in
Computer Law & Security Review, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.002
Authors

Gianclaudio Malgieri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 8 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 68 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 20%
Computer Science 19 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 8%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 73 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#641,153
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Computer Law & Security Review
#12
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,831
of 363,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Law & Security Review
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them