↓ Skip to main content

Incremental Cost of Medical Care after Hip Fracture and First Vertebral Fracture: The Rotterdam Study

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Incremental Cost of Medical Care after Hip Fracture and First Vertebral Fracture: The Rotterdam Study
Published in
Osteoporosis International, August 1999
DOI 10.1007/s001980050196
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. E. D. H. De Laet, B. A. van Hout, H. Burger, A. E. A. M. Weel, A. Hofman, H. A. P. Pols

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the additional cost of medical care (the incremental cost) caused by incident hip and vertebral fractures, using a matched case cohort design within a longitudinal follow-up study. Incident hip fractures were recorded using the regular follow-up system of the Rotterdam Study. Incident vertebral fractures were recorded by morphometric comparison of spinal radiographs taken at intervals of 2.2 years on average. The matched control group was randomly selected from other participants of the Rotterdam Study in whom no fracture occurred during follow-up, but who were otherwise comparable at baseline. Cases were matched for age, gender, self-perceived health, ability to perform activities of daily life, living situation and general practitioner. Medical expenditure was assessed by retrieval of the general practice medical records and by recording all hospital and nursing home admissions, and all general practice and outpatient visits. Pharmaceutical consumption was recorded through the computerized records of the central pharmacy. Valid results were obtained for 44 pairs (91%) in the hip fracture and for 42 pairs (93%) in the vertebral fracture group. Cost of medical consumption in the year before the hip fracture was similar in patients and control subjects, but the incremental cost in the first year after the hip fracture was almost US$10 000. In the second year after hip fracture the incremental cost was still about $1000. Accounting for the excess mortality in hip fracture patients had little effect on cost in the first year, but cost in the second year was doubled to almost $2000. For vertebral fractures, we did not detect important acute care costs, but these fractures were associated with a yearly recurrent incremental cost of over $1000. However, almost half this difference was already present before the occurrence of the fracture, and was attributable to hospital admissions. The remainder of the incremental cost was mainly due to pharmaceutical consumption and to a lesser extent to admissions to orthopedic surgery wards. We conclude that hip fractures cause excess mortality and an important incremental cost especially during the first year, and that these could probably be avoided by prevention of hip fractures. For vertebral fractures we found no evidence of important acute care costs but we observed a yearly returning incremental cost. Part of this incremental cost, however, was pre-existing and might therefore by caused by co-morbidity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 8 27%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,712,503
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#785
of 3,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,896
of 34,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.