| Title |
The pathogenesis of mucositis: updated perspectives and emerging targets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-019-04893-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Bowen, N. Al-Dasooqi, P. Bossi, H. Wardill, Y. Van Sebille, A. Al-Azri, E. Bateman, M. E. Correa, J. Raber-Durlacher, A. Kandwal, B. Mayo, R. G. Nair, A. Stringer, K. ten Bohmer, D. Thorpe, R. V. Lalla, S. Sonis, K. Cheng, S. Elad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#886
of 5,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,766
of 363,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#16
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.