You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endovascular Stenting of a LVAD Outflow Graft Thrombosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1097/mat.0000000000000371 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laila Hubbert, Claes Forssell, Jacek Baranowski, Bo Lindgren, Jonas Holm, Henrik Ahn |
| Abstract |
We report the endovascular stenting of an outflow tract thrombosis in a left ventricular assist device in a patient with relative contraindications to sternotomy and pump exchange. This report highlights the importance of simultaneous prevention of stroke using filter devices in the common carotid arteries.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cyprus | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 52% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,789,608
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#471
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,968
of 421,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.