↓ Skip to main content

Gay Men are Less Likely to Use Condoms with Casual Sex Partners They Know ‘Well’

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Gay Men are Less Likely to Use Condoms with Casual Sex Partners They Know ‘Well’
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-9952-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Garrett Prestage, Fengyi Jin, Andrew Grulich, John de Wit, Iryna Zablotska

Abstract

Health in Men (HIM) was an open cohort study of 1,427 HIV-negative homosexual men in Sydney. The majority of respondents' unprotected anal intercourse (UAIC) events were with partners whose HIV status they did not know. Nonetheless, with casual partners with whom they engaged in UAIC, respondents indicated that they knew 'well' 28.9% of the HIV-negative partners and 26.2% of HIV-positive partners, but only 7.6% of the HIV status unknown partners. Respondents were more likely to have engaged in UAIC with partners they knew well (McNemar P < 0.001). The challenge for HIV prevention is that many gay men's decisions about condom use may be driven as much by their relationship with individual partners as their commitment to 'safe sex'.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 9 28%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,273,551
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,228
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,343
of 111,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.