You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Loss of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on 3.0 tesla susceptibility‐weighted imaging in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Neurology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ana.24646 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto De Marzi, Klaus Seppi, Birgit Högl, Christoph Müller, Christoph Scherfler, Ambra Stefani, Alex Iranzo, Eduardo Tolosa, Joan Santamarìa, Elke Gizewski, Michael Schocke, Elisabeth Skalla, Christian Kremser, Werner Poewe |
| Abstract |
We assessed loss of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity (DNH) on high-field susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), a novel MRI marker for Parkinson's Disease (PD), in 15 subjects with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and compared findings to 42 healthy controls (HC) and 104 PD patients. We found loss of DNH in at least two thirds of iRBD subjects, which approaches the rate seen in PD and is in contrast to findings in HC. We propose that absence of DNH on high-field SWI could identify prodromal degenerative parkinsonism in iRBD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 14% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,002,727
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#1,441
of 5,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,306
of 304,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.