| Title |
Comparative efficacy of linezolid and vancomycin for endotracheal tube MRSA biofilms from ICU patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2523-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laia Fernández-Barat, Ana Motos, Mauro Panigada, Francisco Álvarez-Lerma, Lucía Viña, Ruben Lopez-Aladid, Adrian Ceccato, Gianluigi Li Bassi, David P. Nicolau, Yuli Lopez, Laura Muñoz, Laura Guerrero, Dolors Soy, Trinidad Israel, Pedro Castro, Antoni Torres |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,901,007
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,209
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,531
of 360,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#75
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.