↓ Skip to main content

Genetic analysis of the aquaporin-4 gene for anti-AQP4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica in a Japanese population

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Genetic analysis of the aquaporin-4 gene for anti-AQP4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica in a Japanese population
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10384-016-0441-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikihide Ogasawara, Akira Meguro, Tsutomu Sakai, Nobuhisa Mizuki, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Kazuo Fujihara, Hiroshi Tsuneoka, Keigo Shikishima

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory demyelinating disorder that generally affects the optic nerve and spinal cord. The etiology of this disease is still uncertain, but autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4) are specific and pathogenic for NMO. Recent studies show that AQP4 gene variants are associated with NMO. In this study, we assessed the contribution of AQP4 genetic variants to susceptibility to anti-AQP4 antibody (AQP4-Ab)-positive NMO in a Japanese population. The subjects were 16 patients with AQP4-Ab-positive NMO (13 sporadic cases, and 3 familial cases from 2 families) and 255 healthy controls. All coding exons of AQP4 were sequenced and five tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AQP4 were genotyped. We also performed an imputation analysis to evaluate the potential association of un-genotyped SNPs in AQP4. Known or novel mutations were not detected in any coding exon regions. The T allele frequency of polymorphism (-810 bp (C/T): rs2075575) of the promoter region in patients with AQP4-Ab-positive NMO was significantly higher than that in controls (50.0 vs 25.7 %, P = 0.0036, Pc = 0.018 odds ratio = 2.89). No other tag or imputed SNPs were significant. These findings suggest that the T allele of rs2075575 is a risk for AQP4-Ab-positive NMO. However, the results are the opposite of a previous study in the southern Han Chinese population, and therefore further genetic studies are needed to determine the possible contribution of the AQP4 region to development of NMO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Neuroscience 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,449,393
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#302
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,896
of 300,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.