↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular volume and function in middle‐aged healthy chinese people with 3 Tesla MRI

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular volume and function in middle‐aged healthy chinese people with 3 Tesla MRI
Published in
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/jmri.25243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cai‐Ying Li, Bu‐Lang Gao, Fu‐Qian Guo, Xue‐Jing Zhang, Qiong‐Ying Fan, Bai‐Lin Wu, Cheng Xiang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, Tong Pan

Abstract

To quantitatively investigate left ventricular volume and function in middle-aged healthy subjects. Ninety healthy volunteers underwent cardiac 3 Tesla MRI. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), myocardial mass (MM), and their normalized indices (EDVI, ESVI, SVI, CI, and MI, respectively) after corrected with the body surface area (BSA) were analyzed and compared at different ages. All subjects had successfully completed the 3-Tesla cardiac MR. Females had significantly smaller EDV (110.5 ± 9.2 versus 125.7 ± 8.3 mL), ESV (36.1 ± 3.5 versus 41.5 ± 3.8 mL), SV (74.3 ± 6.3 versus 84.2 ± 6.7 mL), CO (5.4 ± 0.8 versus 5.8 ± 0.9 l/min) and MM (73.0 ± 10.5 versus 94.8 ± 10.6 g) than males (P < 0.05). The EF had no significant (P = 0.47) difference between genders (67.3 ± 1.7 percent in females versus 66.9 ± 2.4 percent in males). After normalization with BSA, no significant (P > 0.05) difference was detected between the genders in EDVI (71.2 ± 4.3 versus 71.1 ± 4.2 mL/m(2) , P = 0.882), ESVI (23.3 ± 1.9 versus 23.5 ± 1.9 mL/m(2) , P = 0.733) and SVI (47.9 ± 2.9 versus 47.7 ± 3.7 mL/m(2) , P = 0.698) except for CI and MI. Females had significantly (P < 0.05) greater CI (3.5 ± 0.4 versus 3.3 ± 0.4) but smaller MI (46.9 ± 5.3 versus 53.6 ± 7.6) than males. EDV, EDVI, ESV, ESVI, SV, and SVI significantly (P < 0.05) decreased with age increase. BSA was positively correlated with EDV, ESV, SV, MM, and CO. No significance (P > 0.05) was detected in other parameters. The left ventricular volume and function differs in women compared with men in the middle-aged population, and these parameters have a tendency of decrease with ageing. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Engineering 2 12%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,699,002
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#2,454
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,167
of 306,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#27
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.