↓ Skip to main content

The role of number of items per trial in best–worst scaling experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The role of number of items per trial in best–worst scaling experiments
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, July 2019
DOI 10.3758/s13428-019-01270-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoff Hollis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Mathematics 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,981
of 2,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,542
of 360,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.