| Title |
Coral bleaching impacts from back-to-back 2015–2016 thermal anomalies in the remote central Indian Ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Coral Reefs, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00338-019-01821-9 |
| Authors |
Catherine E. I. Head, Daniel T. I. Bayley, Gwilym Rowlands, Ronan C. Roche, David M. Tickler, Alex D. Rogers, Heather Koldewey, John R. Turner, Dominic A. Andradi-Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 22% |
| Australia | 16 | 14% |
| United States | 15 | 13% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 68% |
| Scientists | 33 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#207,401
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#11
of 1,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,007
of 364,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.