| Title |
Hyperspectral VNIR-spectroscopy and imagery as a tool for monitoring herbicide damage in wilding conifers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-019-02055-0 |
| Authors |
Rebecca C. Scholten, Joachim Hill, Willy Werner, Henning Buddenbaum, Jonathan P. Dash, Mireia Gomez Gallego, Carol A. Rolando, Grant D. Pearse, Robin Hartley, Honey Jane Estarija, Michael S. Watt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Peru | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 46% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 29% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,817,581
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#740
of 2,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,503
of 347,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#20
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.