↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Loss Aversion in Public Preferences for Wetland Management Policies: Evidence from a Choice Experiment with Reference-Dependent Discrete Choice Model

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
The Importance of Loss Aversion in Public Preferences for Wetland Management Policies: Evidence from a Choice Experiment with Reference-Dependent Discrete Choice Model
Published in
Wetlands, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13157-019-01195-2
Authors

Biqi Mao, Changlin Ao, Jingxia Wang, Lishan Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Master 3 5%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 36 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 36 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,297,434
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#699
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,655
of 352,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.