| Title |
Deterministic vs. Probabilistic: Best Practices for Patient Matching Based on a Comparison of Two Implementations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-019-00253-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason Nagels, Sida Wu, Valentina Gorokhova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,826,113
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#624
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,408
of 347,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.