| Title |
Accuracy of single-pass whole-body computed tomography for detection of injuries in patients with major blunt trauma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.111420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dirk Stengel, Caspar Ottersbach, Gerrit Matthes, Moritz Weigeldt, Simon Grundei, Grit Rademacher, Anja Tittel, Sven Mutze, Axel Ekkernkamp, Matthias Frank, Uli Schmucker, Julia Seifert |
| Abstract |
Contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography (also called "pan-scanning") is considered to be a conclusive diagnostic tool for major trauma. We sought to determine the accuracy of this method, focusing on the reliability of negative results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 24% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 74% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,559,731
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,958
of 8,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,129
of 156,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#14
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.