| Title |
Prevalence of Indoor Tanning Among U.S. High School Students from 2009 to 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Community Health, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10900-019-00685-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn M. Holman, Sherry Everett Jones, Jin Qin, Lisa C. Richardson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,654,117
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#104
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,825
of 351,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.