↓ Skip to main content

Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and face: a single-center analysis of treatment outcomes in 43 patients in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and face: a single-center analysis of treatment outcomes in 43 patients in Japan
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00432-016-2151-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takamichi Ito, Hiroshi Uchi, Takeshi Nakahara, Gaku Tsuji, Yoshinao Oda, Akihito Hagihara, Masutaka Furue

Abstract

For a better understanding of angiosarcoma, we summarized our 30-year experience of conventional treatment outcomes before the era of molecular-targeted therapy. We conducted a retrospective review of our 43 patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and face, and investigated the prognostic factors including the treatment strategy. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, together with multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. All patients were Japanese (25 males and 18 females), with a mean age of 72.1. For the initial treatment of the primary lesion, 34 patients underwent radiotherapy with or without taxanes (docetaxel and/or paclitaxel); only 6 patients underwent surgical excision. As the systemic adjuvant therapy, 19 patients were treated with taxanes and 15 with interleukin-2. Interestingly, patients who underwent the continued chemotherapy with taxanes had significantly prolonged DSS (5-year DSS, 57.0 vs. 19.6 %; median survival, 62.2 vs. 17.7 months; P = 0.0049) and EFS (5-year EFS, 34.9 vs. 5.6 %; median survival, 46.7 vs. 12.4 months; P = 0.0024) than the others. The continuous use of taxanes was also a prognostic factor in multivariate analyses. Neither radiotherapy nor surgical excision significantly influenced the patients' outcome. Among five patients who survived more than 5 years, three underwent surgical excision of the primary tumor or lung metastasis. Our results suggest that continued chemotherapy with taxanes is important for patient survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1,504
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,984
of 302,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.