| Title |
Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-019-03184-y |
| Authors |
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Emanuela Reale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| Peru | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Librarian | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,658,912
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#550
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,509
of 361,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.