You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph16142448 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula Hooper, Sarah Foster, Billie Giles-Corti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#20,028
of 31,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,589
of 360,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#439
of 654 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 654 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.