You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CONSIDERATIONS ON SPATIAL QUALITY OF RENDAINO AREA(HILLSIDES OF MT.HIDARIDAIMONJI) IN KYOTO
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3130/aija.74.635 |
| Authors |
Shunya TAKAHASHI, Kikuma WATANABE, Shuji FUNO |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 31% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| China | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,693,506
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#20
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,243
of 188,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.